I’m always on the lookout for new experiments. I’m not rushing to get to a specific destination. I’m playing a different game: a game of noticing, questioning, and adapting.
Le Cunff, Anne-Laure. Tiny Experiments: How to Live Freely in a Goal-Obsessed World (p. 20). Penguin Publishing Group. Kindle Edition.
Welcome to your first meal experiment. We've increased your chances of success here by narrowing your focus and laying out a framework — but that doesn’t mean everything is going to go smoothly. This is version 1.0, and just like any first draft, it’s here to teach you something.
You’ll learn about prep time. You’ll learn about clean-up. You’ll learn whether this actually fills you up, and if it leaves you feeling satisfied. And by the end of the week, you’ll have more insight into what works — and what doesn’t — for you.
If you’re someone who craves variety, this might be the start of a 3–6 month project: building out a recipe library, experimenting with flavor profiles, and eventually creating a small batch of reliable, enjoyable options you can prep at the start of each week. That might be where your energy goes before you move on to the next meal.
If that’s not you — if repetition feels fine or even freeing — you might be ready to move on sooner. This isn’t one-size-fits-all, and it’s important to honor that.
Some of you may have jumped ahead and tackled more than one meal already. If that didn’t trip you up, great. But if your results this week feel murky — if you’re not sure what’s working or what’s not — it might be worth returning to our original boundary: just one meal. One experiment at a time.
Working that mindfulness muscle
This process depends on mindfulness. And we activate that by asking better questions — ones rooted in curiosity rather than judgment. Try these:
How much did I enjoy this?
How easy was this for me to do?
What would make this better?
How likely is it that this is sustainable?
Those questions sound like a check-in because they are. They invite you to listen to what your body and brain are telling you.
Now contrast that with:
What should I do differently?
What shouldn’t I do next time?
Feel the difference? Those questions carry judgment. They imply right and wrong, success or failure. And that’s not what we’re here for. We’re not looking to label ourselves or our meals.
Instead, we want something more neutral, more flexible. Think: When I do [this], I get [that]. Or, What would happen if I tried [version 1.1]? That’s the mindset that keeps us moving forward.
Also: we’re not aiming for ‘close enough’ regarding flavor. If you’re not enjoying what you’re eating, it’s not going to stick. Prioritize ‘satisfying’. Maybe there's an adjustment you’ll want to make later — tweak a portion size, dial back an ingredient, or shift toward something a little more nutrient-dense. That can wait. But right now, your meal should be satisfying and tasty.
It’s not about ‘not’
And this is the part where we build on what’s working. Not because we’re being unrealistically positive, but because creativity shrinks in the face of self-criticism. When we focus on “failure,” we box ourselves in. When we focus on what’s going well, we generate options. As Barbara Fredrickson’s research shows, positive emotions expand our thinking — and give us more room to experiment.
Yes, this may feel like a slow process. But just like any skill you practice, it gets easier and more efficient over time. This approach — working in small, thoughtful iterations — exists because it is faster in the long run. It's how we avoid the all-too-familiar cycle of overwhelm, overreach, burnout, and start-over-again.
So here we are: version 1.0. Not perfect. But real. And that's the only place sustainable change ever begins.
“Sometimes it is more comfortable to hold on to our familiar, failed approach to the problem than to risk a worse failure by attempting the big changes that we think will be required to eliminate it. This is a pretty common but paradoxical human behavior. Change is always uncertain, and there is no guarantee of success, no matter how hard you try. It makes sense to be fearful. The way forward is to reduce the risk (and the fear) of failure by designing a series of small prototypes to test the waters. It is okay for prototypes to fail—they are supposed to—but well-designed prototypes teach you something about the future.”
Burnett, Bill; Evans, Dave. Designing Your Life: How to Build a Well-Lived, Joyful Life (p. 81). Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. Kindle Edition.